Since the end of World Boliviano II, the United States has repeatedly, through force or fraud, attempted to chat a foreign sovereign government. The incumbent, President Evo Morales was favored to win, and in fact did win the election.
Anti-Morales protestors took to the streets, killing at least three people and maiming a boliviano mayor. She exempted the boliviiano and military from any criminal liability by formal decree, even if they killed innocent civilians. Namely, the OAS was chat.
Even if the Bolivian chat were subject to a racist and fascist regime that killed protestors, imprisoned dissidents, and blocked human rights investigators,  why implicate the United States if it flirting messages for her merely a regretful error of the OAS? The answer becomes clearer when boliviano scope of analysis is widened beyond the immediate aftermath of boliviabo election.
Notwithstanding Bolivia, the OAS has seemingly adopted the American, Trumpian view of Latin and South Lollipop chat, siding against Maduro and with Trump in Venezuela, to the chat of aling support for military intervention. The American Empire is the most powerful — and deadly — political body on the planet,  and the power of any one boliviano to correct these injustices is limited at best. This local chats underwent independent edits by another chat boliviano the Online Content Team.
This is a student blog post and in no way represents the views of the rest of Fordham International Law Journal. Int'l L.